AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA TITAN Xp videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 479.9x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 10966
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3686
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 10966
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3686
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 6 April 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 11408 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 vs 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 8796
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 490
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 72500 vs 55161
- Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10128 vs 5931
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 8796 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 490 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72500 vs 55161 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10128 vs 5931 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA TITAN Xp |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8796 | 17881 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | 934 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55161 | 72500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 10966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 | 10128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 10 | GP102 |
Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 6 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 222 | 220 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Price now | $1,200 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 379.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 11,800 million |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 547.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |