AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 461.5x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3715
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3356
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3715
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 vs 1 October 2016
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1265 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15308 vs 8796
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 490
  • Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64226 vs 55344
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11117
  • Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11117
  • Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 5931
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1645 MHz vs 1265 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 15308 vs 8796
PassMark - G2D Mark 711 vs 490
Geekbench - OpenCL 64226 vs 55344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20035 vs 11117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20035 vs 11117
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8770 vs 5931

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8796
15308
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
490
711
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
55344
64226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11117
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8904
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7694
3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5931
8770
Name AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G3D Mark 8796 15308
PassMark - G2D Mark 490 711
Geekbench - OpenCL 55344 64226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11117 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8904 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7694 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11117 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8904 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7694 3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5931 8770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 545.751

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5600M NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Essentials

Architecture RDNA Pascal
Code name Navi 10 GP102
Launch date 7 Jan 2020 1 October 2016
Place in performance rating 223 226
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $5,999
Price now $4,403.52
Value for money (0-100) 3.90

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1265 MHz 1645 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 2304 3840
Texture fill rate 182.2 GTexel/s 394.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 10300 million 11,800 million
Core clock speed 1506 MHz
Floating-point performance 12,634 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 8-pin
Length 267 mm
SLI options 1
Width 2" (5.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 9016 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 384 Bit

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management