AMD Radeon RX 5600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5600M and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 412.6x more texture fill rate: 182.2 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 6.8x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 490 vs 484
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 3555
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7694 vs 3198
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 3555
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7694 vs 3198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 vs 484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 vs 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12328 vs 8796
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 170259 vs 55515
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11451 vs 11117
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11451 vs 11117
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12328 vs 8796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 170259 vs 55515 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11451 vs 11117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11451 vs 11117 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8796 | 12328 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 490 | 484 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55515 | 170259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7694 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7694 | 3198 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5931 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5600M | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Volta |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 223 | 220 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1265 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
| Texture fill rate | 182.2 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 21,100 million |
| Core clock speed | 1246 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
AMDRadeon VII
AMDRadeon RX 5600M vs
IntelArc A310
