AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 6580.6x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1826 vs 326
- 5.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 3722
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 119
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3168 vs 716
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 vs 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 3722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 vs 716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- 114.5x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 3722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 119 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GK208B |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 1297 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 297.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |