AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1127 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 1133.3x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 18664
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 22 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1127 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 18664 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 928.1x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2284 vs 1826
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 392
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6084 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2284 vs 1826 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6084 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 2284 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 18664 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 673 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3332 | 6084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GM206 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 22 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 503 | 505 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,413 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 72 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,940 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |