AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1214.3x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 16588
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 18 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 16588 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
- 826.9x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 417 vs 392
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5637 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 vs 392 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5637 vs 3332 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 16588 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 392 | 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3332 | 5637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 82.563 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.506 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.779 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.607 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7779 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7779 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M3000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GM204 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 503 | 504 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,150 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1,024 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |