AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 773 MHz
- 1015.1x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20572 vs 18372
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 29 June 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 773 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 vs 18372 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000
- Around 63% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1024
- 989.6x better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 vs 1826
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 670 vs 383
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6670 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,573 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 vs 1826 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 670 vs 383 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6670 vs 3168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 2302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 18372 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 670 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 6670 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 732.046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.453 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.725 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6291 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Baffin | GM204 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 29 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 518 | 520 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $791 | |
Price now | $765.93 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.68 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 773 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,573 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 80.39 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |