AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 1102.7x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 14% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1826 vs 1603
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 13 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 74 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 vs 1603 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- 910.8x better floating-point performance: 2,368 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 20572
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 383
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 20572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 383 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 3168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1826 | 1603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20572 | 74175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 567 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3168 | 4306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3448 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Baffin | Curacao |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 13 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 518 | 515 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 2,368 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 74 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |