AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 926-1168 MHz vs 823 MHz
- 3021.4x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9172 vs 3362
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9172 vs 3362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 8 March 2011 |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 vs 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 vs 3362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- 247.7x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 3624
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 3624
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | 6895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | 6895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GF114 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 405 | 470 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 823 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 1,263.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 128.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |