AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 12248.5x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec
- 32x more pipelines: 2048 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 504
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 407
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 64 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- 25.1x better floating-point performance: 128 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 128 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 407 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | G94 |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 3 March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 405 | 402 |
| Price now | $149.99 | |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 128 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 64 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 13 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 128 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Gigaflops | 192 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| CUDA | ||
| MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
| PureVideo HD | ||
