AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD FirePro W9000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 975 MHz
• 1546.2x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8834 vs 6138
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 720
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39121 vs 31775
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 84.462
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 8.988
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 460.234

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

• 644.2x better floating-point performance: 3,994 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1734.394 vs 1022.932
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 84.034

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8834 6138
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	767 720
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39121 31775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	116.142 84.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1022.932 1734.394
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.235 8.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.034 86.984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	607.721 460.234

Compare specifications (specs)