NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- 499.7x better floating-point performance: 3,098 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 185 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- 1993.4x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8856 vs 8781
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 455
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39684 vs 34255
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8856 vs 8781 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 455 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39684 vs 34255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8781 | 8856 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 | 768 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34255 | 39684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 | 11281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 4362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 336 | 339 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz | 1257 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 96.8 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 185 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,700 million |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.3 GB / s | 256 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
