AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 6071.7x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 1469
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 349
- 9.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 4271
- 9.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 11.994
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 vs 291.627
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 1.023
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 15.139
- 25.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 23.651
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 1790
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2153
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 1790
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1427
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2153
- Around 96% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 513
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 29 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 vs 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 513 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 123x better floating-point performance: 762.6 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 64 Watt vs 185 Watt
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 513 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK107 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 29 May 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $89 |
Place in performance rating | 341 | 1270 |
Price now | $169.99 | $94.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | 18.87 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 993 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 762.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |