AMD Radeon RX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 993 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 1469
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 349
- 9.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 4271
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 11.994
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 291.627
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 1.023
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 15.139
- 25.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 23.651
- 6.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 1790
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 1427
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 2153
- 6.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 1790
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 1427
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 2153
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 513
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 29 May 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 versus 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 versus 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 versus 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 versus 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 versus 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 versus 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 versus 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 versus 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 versus 513 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- 123x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 64 Watt versus 185 Watt
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt versus 185 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 | 1469 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 | 4271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | 11.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | 291.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | 1.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | 15.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | 23.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 2153 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | GK107 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 29 May 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $89 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 341 | 1270 |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | $94.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 76.21 | 18.87 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1340 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1257 MHz | 993 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 6.2 TFLOPs | 762.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 192.96 GTexel/s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |