AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3718
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3718
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3355
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 22 February 2019 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 809 vs 667
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12916 vs 8574
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 5140
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 5140
- Around 42% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6273 vs 4431
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 vs 667 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12916 vs 8574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 5140 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6273 vs 4431 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 | 809 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8574 | 12916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | 6273 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60900 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 20 | TU116 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 213 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |