AMD Radeon RX 590 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1469 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- 2726.5x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 81.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9390 vs 1810
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 676
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 45900 vs 17914
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 11 April 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 81.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9390 vs 1810 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45900 vs 17914 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
- 367.7x better floating-point performance: 2,611 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 175 Watt
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9390 | 1810 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45900 | 17914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 30 | Baffin |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 11 April 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 278 | 280 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 2,611 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 81.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 3,000 million |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |