AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 802.3x more texture fill rate: 222.48 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 800x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 vs 2036.763
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 vs 27.417
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13383 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3690
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13383 vs 11173
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 vs 27 May 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 vs 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 vs 27.417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 vs 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 1249.7x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15560 vs 9380
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 789
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55425 vs 45581
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 vs 137.469
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 vs 12.352
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 762.142
- Around 44% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1557 vs 1079
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1469 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 7.1 TFLOPs |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15560 vs 9380 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 789 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55425 vs 45581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 vs 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 vs 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 762.142 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1557 vs 1079 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9380 | 15560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 886 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45581 | 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 11173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1079 | 1557 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 30 | GP104 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 15 November 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | 283 | 286 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1469 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 7.1 TFLOPs | 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.48 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |