AMD Radeon RX 640 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 188
- 65.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1952 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 8 November 2004 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 vs 188 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1952 vs 30 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10390 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 340 | 188 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1952 | 30 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Radeon Xpress 200 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | RS480 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 8 November 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 810 | 939 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |