AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 914 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- 867x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11683 vs 9744
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 352 vs 217
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 914 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 vs 9744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 vs 217 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2775
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 3278
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 3278
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 2142
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 vs 3278 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 vs 2142 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 4148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 4148 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | 9744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 217 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 2577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GM107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 797 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
| VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
