AMD Radeon RX 640 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2436.3x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 16 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 352 vs 320
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2142 vs 401
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 9 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 vs 320 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 vs 401 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3262 vs 2775
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3262 vs 2775
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3262 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3262 vs 2775 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3262 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3262 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | 320 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | 401 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | M96 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 9 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 792 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 514 million |
| Floating-point performance | 320.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 19.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
| 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
| DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
| HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
