AMD Radeon RX 640 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 676.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 27 September 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 57.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2344 vs 1769
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2344 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2775
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 3278
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 3278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 3278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 2344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 5269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 5269 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | Baffin |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 27 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 796 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 57.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
