AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 823 MHz
- 739.7x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11459 vs 10723
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 25 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 vs 10723 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1769
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2775
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2775
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 3278
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 3278
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 338
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3059 vs 2066
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2775 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 vs 3278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 vs 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 434 vs 338 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3059 vs 2066 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 4184 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 4184 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11459 | 10723 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 434 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2066 | 3059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Arctic Islands | GF114 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 25 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 812 | 815 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $138 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 823 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 1,950 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 128.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |