AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX 640

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz
867x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 68 Watt
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1769 vs 1577
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1769 vs 1577
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2775 vs 1671
Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2775 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 68 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4921 vs 3278
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4921 vs 3278
Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 vs 11437
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 340
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3559 vs 2041

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4921 vs 3278
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4921 vs 3278
Geekbench - OpenCL	12020 vs 11437
PassMark - G2D Mark	545 vs 340
PassMark - G3D Mark	3559 vs 2041

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1769

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

1671

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

1671

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3278

4921

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

12020

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

340

545

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2041

3559

Name	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1769	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1769	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2775	1671
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2775	1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3278	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3278	4921
Geekbench - OpenCL	11437	12020
PassMark - G2D Mark	340	545
PassMark - G3D Mark	2041	3559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		166.26
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 640	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Arctic Islands	GM107
Launch date	13 May 2019	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	809	810
Launch price (MSRP)		$395.75
Price now		$343.99
Type		Workstation
Value for money (0-100)		13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz	1124 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1046 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	640
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	68 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,439 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)	202 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)