AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 658.4x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1769
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1769
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2775
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2775
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 3278
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 3278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1769 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2775 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5923 vs 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5923 vs 3278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1769 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1769 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2775 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2775 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3278 | 5923 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3278 | 5923 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11683 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 352 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2142 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 640 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Arctic Islands | GP107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 794 | 525 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 640 with others
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
AMDRadeon RX 640 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
