AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16471 vs 12998
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 537
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 vs 12998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83425 vs 82703
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 15486
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 15486
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 1804
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83425 vs 82703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 15486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 15486 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 1804 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 | 12998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 | 83425 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 XT | TU104 |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Place in performance rating | 191 | 168 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 259.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |