AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 146.9x more texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16471 vs 8299
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 787
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82703 vs 55512
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15486 vs 10141
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15486 vs 10141
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 vs 8299 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 787 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 vs 55512 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2048
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 799.933 vs 706.665
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3367
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3367
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2048 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 vs 706.665 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3367 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16471 | 8299 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 787 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82703 | 55512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1804 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 XT | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 26 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 191 | 192 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Design | reference | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 8,900 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 277 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro Duo
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
