AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1968 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 2589 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16488 vs 14832
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 705
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3367 vs 3346
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3367 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 296.6 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16488 vs 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- Around 45% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 15486
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 15486
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 15486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 15486 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16488 | 14832 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 705 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 19565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1807 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | TU104 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 191 | 189 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 296.6 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 18.98 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 9.492 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 296.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | 3.0 x16 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |