AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 331.4 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16468 vs 10806
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 911 vs 760
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15486 vs 15257
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15486 vs 15257
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 vs 8 Jun 2021 |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16468 vs 10806 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 vs 760 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 vs 15257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 vs 15257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1968 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 2589 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
Core clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1968 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2903 MHz vs 2589 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16468 | 10806 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 911 | 760 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82690 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 706.665 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15486 | 15257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3728 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3367 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15486 | 15257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3728 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3367 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1805 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro W6600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 XT | Navi 23 |
Launch date | 30 Jul 2021 | 8 Jun 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Place in performance rating | 188 | 190 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2589 MHz | 2903 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1968 MHz | 2200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 662.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.21 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.60 TFLOPS | 10.40 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.7 GPixel/s | 185.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 331.4 GTexel/s | 325.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 11060 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |