AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and AMD Radeon RX 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3373
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3373
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3373 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1489 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 505.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22131 vs 13921
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 724
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129479 vs 66187
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16162 vs 14178
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16162 vs 14178
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3188 vs 1495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1489 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1792 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 vs 13921 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 vs 724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 vs 66187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 vs 14178 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 vs 1495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13921 | 22131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 988 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66187 | 129479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3373 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1495 | 3188 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 84 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | 60 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 202.1 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 505.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

