AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3983.1x more texture fill rate: 235.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14178 vs 6316
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 8390
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14178 vs 6316
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 8390
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 8390 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 66084
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 8006
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 8006
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 66084 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 8006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 8006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13907 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 721 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66084 | 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1500 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 2021 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 170 | 173 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 925 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |