AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13907 vs 12207
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 721 vs 518
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3356
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13907 vs 12207 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 721 vs 518 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 14178
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 14178
- 5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 1500
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 14178 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 1500 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13907 | 12207 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 721 | 518 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66084 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1500 | 7438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 170 | 171 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1110 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
