AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13907 vs 13081
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 721 vs 540
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3357
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1489 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 2105 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13907 vs 13081
PassMark - G2D Mark 721 vs 540
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8612 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8006 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8612 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8006 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
  • Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
  • Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84400 vs 66084
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 14178
  • Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 14178
  • 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 1500
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
Pipelines 3072 vs 1792
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 84400 vs 66084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 14178
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 14178
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879 vs 1500

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13907
13081
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
721
540
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
66084
84400
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14178
19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8612
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8006
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14178
19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8612
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8006
3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1500
7879
Name AMD Radeon RX 6600M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 13907 13081
PassMark - G2D Mark 721 540
Geekbench - OpenCL 66084 84400
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14178 19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8612 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8006 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14178 19377
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8612 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8006 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1500 7879

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 6600M NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 23 TU104
Launch date 2021 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 170 169
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2105 MHz 1350 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 1489 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.544 TFLOPS 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 3072
Pixel fill rate 134.7 GPixel/s 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 235.8 GTexel/s 259.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.2
OpenCL 2.1 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 256 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6