AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13921 vs 12998
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 537
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3357
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13921 vs 12998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83425 vs 66187
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 14178
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 14178
- 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 1495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1792 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83425 vs 66187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 14178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 14178 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 1495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13921 | 12998 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66187 | 83425 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 19377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1495 | 7879 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6600M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 168 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Compute units | 28 | |
| Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | 259.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.59 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 259.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600M with others
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6600M vs
IntelArc A530M
