AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 10 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 6022.79
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 175.219
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3716
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3356
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3716
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 10 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 8704 vs 2560
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25323 vs 19888
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1041 vs 941
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167585 vs 97100
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 349.422
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 34.064
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 1699.337
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 15315
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 15315
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17706 vs 12774
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25323 vs 19888 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1041 vs 941 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167585 vs 97100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17706 vs 12774 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19888 | 25323 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | 1041 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 97100 | 167585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12774 | 17706 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA102 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 52 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 320 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 320 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |