NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.9x more pipelines: 7424 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24971 vs 19824
- Around 72% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4179 vs 2435
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 159976 vs 100473
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
Pipelines | 7424 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24971 vs 19824 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 vs 2435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 159976 vs 100473 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 946 vs 931
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 vs 931 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 931 | 946 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 24971 | 19824 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4179 | 2435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 159976 | 100473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | AD104 | Navi 22 |
Launch date | 2023 | 3 Mar 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 51 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2581 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 2321 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 24.72 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7424 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 386.3 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | 17200 million |
Compute units | 40 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |