NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher pipelines: 4352 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 165 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1068 vs 946
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22758 vs 19824
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2907 vs 2435
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
| Pipelines | 4352 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 vs 946 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22758 vs 19824 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2907 vs 2435 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2535 MHz
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 2310 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2535 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 344.8 GTexel/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1068 | 946 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22758 | 19824 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2907 | 2435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Launch date | 18 May 2023 | 3 Mar 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 48 | 51 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 4352 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.7 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 22900 million | 17200 million |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 240 mm, 9.4 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
