AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 10.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 661.977
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 129.036
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3718
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3359
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3718
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- 4x more pipelines: 10240 vs 2560
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27216 vs 19886
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1092 vs 941
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 97104
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 vs 349.422
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 vs 34.064
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 vs 1699.337
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 15315
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 15315
- Around 55% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19749 vs 12774
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27216 vs 19886 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 vs 941 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 97104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 vs 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 vs 34.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 vs 1699.337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19749 vs 12774 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19886 | 27216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | 1092 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 97104 | 209081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 714.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 60.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 129.036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 2585.274 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12774 | 19749 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA102 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $1199 |
Place in performance rating | 46 | 49 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |