AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 8 GB
- 263.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1845 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1845 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1489 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 564
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 13560
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 78243
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 16145
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 16145
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1489 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 564 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 vs 13560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 vs 78243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 16145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 16145 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13560 | 18198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78243 | 98281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 25232 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1845 | 7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 22 | TU104 |
Place in performance rating | 126 | 129 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 13.6 B |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |