AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 83% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- 4716.2x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25118 vs 9083
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1020 vs 700
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150050 vs 102892
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 vs 9083 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 vs 700 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150050 vs 102892 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 | 9083 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 | 700 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150050 | 102892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 21 | GP104 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 62 | 107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |