AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25118 vs 12627
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1020 vs 551
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3356
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3356
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19416 vs 7438
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 vs 12627 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 vs 551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 vs 7438 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 16849
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 16849
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 16849 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25118 | 12627 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150050 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19416 | 7438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Place in performance rating | 62 | 171 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1110 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4608 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 110 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |