AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24055 vs 20037
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1097 vs 851
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155712 vs 138560
- Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 18152 vs 14968
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24055 vs 20037 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1097 vs 851 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155712 vs 138560 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 18152 vs 14968 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 280 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 15257
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1858
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1679
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 15257
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1858
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1679
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 15257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 24055 | 20037 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1097 | 851 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155712 | 138560 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15257 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1858 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1679 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15257 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1858 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1679 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 18152 | 14968 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 18 December 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $2,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 15 | 20 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Compute units | 72 | |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop
