AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22313 vs 19611
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 973 vs 927
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126207 vs 117339
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 337.794
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 31.631
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 190.996
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1654.321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3373 vs 3355
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3373 vs 3355
- 8153x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16306 vs 2
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 vs 19611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 vs 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126207 vs 117339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 16162
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 16162
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 16162 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22313 | 19611 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126207 | 117339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 337.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 31.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 190.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1654.321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16306 | 2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU104 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 76 | 109 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 4.556” (115.7mm) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 650 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 2-Slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |