AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900M and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1626 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 601.9 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 4608 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 vs 876
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22956 vs 15148
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 117969 vs 72690
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 vs 13 Oct 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1626 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 601.9 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 vs 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22956 vs 15148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117969 vs 72690 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 2090 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 180 Watt
Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz vs 2090 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900M | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22956 | 15148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 117969 | 72690 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8083 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 31 | Navi 23 XL |
Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 | 13 Oct 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 39 | 40 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2090 MHz | 2491 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1626 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 267.5 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 601.9 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 132 Watt |
Transistor count | 57700 million | 11060 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.928 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Length | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |