AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900M and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 601.9 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22112 vs 19881
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 104371 vs 97133
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 vs 3 Mar 2021 |
| Texture fill rate | 601.9 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 230 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22112 vs 19881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 104371 vs 97133 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 2090 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 941 vs 884
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1825 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 2090 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 vs 884 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900M | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 884 | 941 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22112 | 19881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 104371 | 97133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12773 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 7900M | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 31 | Navi 22 |
| Launch date | 19 Oct 2023 | 3 Mar 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 44 | 46 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2090 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Compute units | 72 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 267.5 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 601.9 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 57700 million | 17200 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 7900M with others
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700 XT
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 7900M vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
