AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2120 vs 1947
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 326
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14684 vs 5980
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 20.831
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 3396
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 3396
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 1 October 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 1,154 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2120 vs 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14684 vs 5980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 vs 20.831 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 vs 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 vs 3396 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 2x more core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 36% higher pipelines: 960 vs 704
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1857
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3107
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1857
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 vs 704 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2120 | 1947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 326 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14684 | 5980 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 20.831 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Raven | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 815 | 818 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |