AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 629.5x more texture fill rate: 34.62 GTexel/s vs 55 GTexel / s
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2428 vs 2120
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 486.804 vs 364.578
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3107
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3107

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1082 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 444
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14671 vs 14535
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 25.896
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.503
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 53.111
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 100.658
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 2524
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 2524

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2428 2120
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 527
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14535 14671
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.896 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	486.804 364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.503 3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	100.658 262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2524 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3274 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3107

Compare specifications (specs)