AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 55 nm
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 vs 16 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 55 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.055 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.986 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.56 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.412 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 83 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 494 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega | Tesla |
| Code name | Vega | G92B |
| Launch date | 7 Jan 2020 | 16 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1308 | 1305 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 470.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 141 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||