NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1156 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1471 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 768
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 184.405
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 1765.06
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 12.606
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 79.32
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 14462
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 14462
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1156 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1471 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 210 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 vs 184.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 vs 1765.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 vs 12.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 vs 79.32 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 vs 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 vs 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13093 vs 12900
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 61100
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1022.925 vs 926.614
- Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1501 vs 1061
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13093 vs 12900 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 vs 61100 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 vs 926.614 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1501 vs 1061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12900 | 13093 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 | 768 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61100 | 163998 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 184.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 1765.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 12.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 79.32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 1022.925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 14462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1061 | 1501 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 22 February 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 221 | 224 |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
| Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1471 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1156 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 12,500 million |
| Compute units | 56 | |
| Floating-point performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 410 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
