AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 114.3x more memory clock speed: 800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 22 January 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1127 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 72 billion / sec vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,413 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 399
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 vs 1527
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 vs 8941
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 3157
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1127 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 72 billion / sec vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 vs 399 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 vs 1527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 vs 8941 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 673 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 6111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 18734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 162 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega | GM206 |
Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 22 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 514 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 2,413 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,500 million | 2,940 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |