AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 375 MHz
  • 2.7x more boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 375 MHz
  • 9x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
  • 64x more pipelines: 1280 vs 20
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 22.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3900 vs 171
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 275
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2018 vs 18 April 2006
Core clock speed 931 MHz vs 375 MHz
Boost clock speed 1011 MHz vs 375 MHz
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 20
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3900 vs 171
PassMark - G2D Mark 471 vs 275

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3900
171
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
471
275
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3900 171
PassMark - G2D Mark 471 275
Geekbench - OpenCL 19459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 58.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1235.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.195
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 75.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 252.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6318
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2070
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1514
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2091

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Curie
Code name Polaris 22 G71
Launch date 1 February 2018 18 April 2006
Place in performance rating 605 604
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1011 MHz 375 MHz
Core clock speed 931 MHz 375 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,588 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 90 nm
Pipelines 1280 20
Texture fill rate 80.88 GTexel / s 9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 278 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-II
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 9.0c
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 204.8 GB / s 32.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 1024 Bit 500 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type HBM2 256
Shared memory 0 0