AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 2.7x more boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 1280 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 22.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3900 vs 171
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 vs 171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3900 | 171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 22 | G71 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 18 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 605 | 604 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 375 MHz |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |