AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 2,460 gflops
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3664
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19459 vs 17732
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 55.077
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 830.773
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.195 vs 4.132
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 225.985
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5431
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2070 vs 1123
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5431
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2070 vs 1123

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 931 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1011 MHz
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 4.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 627 vs 469
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 75.289
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2678 vs 1514
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2678 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3901 3664
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	469 627
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19459 17732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.195 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 2678

Compare specifications (specs)